Skip to main content
Auto Alpha AdvisoryAuto Alpha Advisory

AI engines, investors and regulators now read all of it

Nobody in your company has read the whole thing.

The independent read of your business, before the people who have to trust it do their own.

the full read from R25,000 · free scan: nine domains, about two minutes

Live engine read of autoalphaadvisory.co.za, dated 2026-09-27: nine domains scored — security 97, seo 95, geo 70, performance 89, content 83, ux & design 88, technical 99, popia 99, email security 99. Overall 88 out of 100, rated Good. GPTBot server-side rendering checks all pass: H1, main copy and JSON-LD identical for GPTBot.
our own site, scored in public — including the flagsrun the same read on your site — free →
  • founder CA(SA) — writes the code
  • own engine SEO 95/100 · public
  • background ex-KPMG audit
  • base Cape Town · serves SA
what the outside reader finds

Your business is checked before anyone calls.

Customers ask ChatGPT and Google who to use. Investors and partners read your website against your documents. Regulators read your privacy policy. Here is what a read of the same surface turns up.

5 of 8

AI crawlers behind ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity got an empty home page from one South African site that let every crawler in. A browser saw it fine.

35 of 58

findings on one full read were the company’s own team’s work: copy, settings and code, hours to weeks. On another, 39 of 56.

Share of 432 answers from four AI models that named each accounting firm, July 2026, for the three most-named firms and the Big 4: BDO 28 percent, Forvis Mazars 20 percent, PKF 16 percent, Deloitte 14 percent, PwC 13 percent, KPMG 12 percent, EY 9 percent. From the SA AI Visibility Index, Edition 1.

Who the AI names isn’t the league table.

Three mid-tier firms were named more often than every Big 4 firm.

SA AI Visibility Index, Edition 1 · method and every question published →
what I do

Read. Fix. Prove.

01 / read

Read

Your website and Google listing, who four AI models name when your buyers ask, what the AI crawlers are actually served, and your public claims checked against their source.

what the read covers →
02 / fix

Fix

Every finding comes back labelled by who can fix it and how long it takes. I fix what’s mine to fix: the site, the copy, the build.

websites and fixes →
03 / prove

Prove

I re-run the checks after the fix, so you see a dated before-and-after, finding by finding, not just a report.

my own read, weak rows included →

I hold my own site to it: 88/100 on my engine, read 27 September 2026.

A report is copyable. A dated before-and-after is not.

why every fix ends in a re-run of the checks, finding by finding — see The Full Read →

two ways in

Two ways in. Prices in rand, fixed before we start.

Which one depends on who would do the work.

owner-run business

Fix what stops Google and the AI assistants sending you customers.

I find it and fix it for a fixed price. Your website is built or rebuilt so the AI can read it, and tested before handover.

fixes
from R3,000
your website, built or rebuilt
R15,000–R65,000
company with a team, a platform or investors

The Full Read.

Your whole public surface read against itself: the site, your claims, your terms and who four AI models name. Every finding labelled by who can fix it, with an action plan.

your own platform
R25,000
credited in full if the fix starts within 30 days
against your competitors
from R37,000
remediation
from R40,000

retainers, readiness audits, sprints and training are on the services page →

It starts with a 15-minute call.

You tell me what matters to you right now. I come back with one thing worth knowing about your business, with its fix, at no cost. If you want the rest, the prices are above.

measuring your AI visibility is becoming a commodity — fixing it isn’t

sources

The accounting figures are from the SA AI Visibility Index, Edition 1 (July 2026, restated 3 September 2026): 36 buyer questions put to ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Perplexity through their APIs, three runs each, 432 answers. The 5 of 8 (the crawlers OpenAI, Anthropic and Perplexity name), 35 of 58 and 39 of 56 figures are from full reads in September 2026, names withheld.

OpenAI’s, Anthropic’s and Perplexity’s crawlers don’t execute JavaScript; generative engines reward statistics, cited sources and expert quotes — levers Princeton measured at +33% / +43% / +115%. Roughly 48% of Google searches now surface an AI Overview, where organic click-through runs at 2.36% against 3.82% without one.

“GEO can boost visibility by up to 40% in generative engine responses.” — Aggarwal et al., “GEO: Generative Engine Optimization” · Princeton · KDD 2024